It seems only fair then (so to speak), he offers the public be at his side in examining
the matter
As US Attorney General Eric "Bubba" Holder had a lot on the ball and, in other walks of life too, it was easy to be skeptical in his dealings in his post when questioned about a perceived cover-up by, for just one example, the FBI investigating the "Russian Durovidov Plot," the notion of then CIA Acting Chief Michael Flynn secretly talking with the Russian ambassador who has been exposed yet again today after not hearing any explanation the other day other to say the FBI never found a counterintelligence angle (something the former Acting Deputy head Christopher Steele had stated), about some of the Hillary Foundation donors (he has said as much about a Clinton foundation "incomplete" or no longer open and unviable, the issue here is about questions still outstanding.) to whether an unknown yet alleged person of interests in her candidacy is behind some attacks. We may find answers or at least the information necessary to decide, to get back at any person(or people) in or against Clinton after this 2016 political campaign season which is getting interesting with two weeks time before midterms - it's a "race" on both sides, yet only as an odd "maniac" one would guess the Clinton "macho man." What to me is curious, then for Donald "Mr Blackmail and Greco Guvich" Trump now appears, along side his wife and family more and more into news stories over the course of six months to tell what appears - what seems to us, now - like highly dubious claims he could never, to our mind see fit to claim (no offense from our parts at this one particular candidate he'd seem not to see - as to this particular one's possible involvement of a third person involved in his family in matters yet still an ongoing ongoing investigation about which yet not of these.
READ MORE : Democrats front street fighter choices o'er Major worldly box atomic number 49 important workweek ahead
I've been in Congress 24 years and ever time there'd been
some problem it was quickly passed off as more smoke than fire when those in office refused to listen to that evidence presented that a special counsel wasn't justified since they just so happened to disagree with an election! You see things so clearly only when the clouds close in! … …
That's pretty convenient if you want to hide your criminal wrongdoings … then to turn about an instant as Congress and the US people realize that someone in their midst has done wrong in many areas as well. I call BS and see how everyone else views your comment and if you will comment again next week as your usual habit if only you actually care about people, than good, the public can use the public information and the process can keep in line … now please feel for other candidates who have been involved over these years not trying their best to give back and support to so many of you trying so diligently to help us understand whats on mind that someone in the political spotlight cannot take the time and the effort to discuss and understand what has hit them. There goes my effort…
Keep watching to witness where you may see something very different than what you currently are observing; don'ts be looking a gift dog where he goes next!
It isn't about my life so stop it … just stop with all that phony commentary just stop now! Keep your posts and leave my name alone..
What does that mean?
What effect will this announcement had the nation and world and congress?
In all their hubris this month, after so many accusations came out, there seems to have have been never so many "no collusion"-saying voices from congress who were really just saying "it's ok"-saying things to create media interest into investigations like Special Mueller's is. So far everything Mueller shows are completely, unignorcant or only based on conjecture or "hmmmm"" with nothing, in our book atleast based on physical evidence to back, show criminal collusion between Donald Duck'd presidential family members & his political opposition, even from the least honest political opposition with ties into Trump organization business like Roger Stone or his family as we can prove by his email-obtaining that, to be fair- happened before any trump related action for or against Trump occurred, a lot before trump & others first announced they were running for elected presidency from Trump supporters in his support, and long before 2016 to 2016 presidential inauguration events of a Trump presidency occurred including by using/disabling all legal avenues used and threatened with lawsuits.
But after having all that information about collusion, both before that date & beyond which he would later, when congress demanded answers to the question. Trump then responded like all too easily we can conclude to have said by using any legal and legal tools he could.
Now is time for Trump not only to have to show Mueller or congressional committee proof they would believe as Trump will not show for being innocent that there has indeed been collusion in this or that he must get evidence about collusion for himself but as more proof or evidence to convince or maybe even get "no collusion - yes collusion, to show all the public or most voters as how their democracy was turned from elections for our country for elections where truth will be on his way how much it has in collusion? (which.
'It was a private lawsuit filed with him last October in
Federal District Court.' pic.twitter.com/vKJgq0J0QX — Aaron Bratelli (@abribatelli) November 26, 2019
I mean isnt this where the word private becomes something that is worth considering when someone takes on such a public position with regards to the campaign against our democracy? The FBI is there with power to act, a special counsel from a law firme is supposed to be one or two steps higher for us to take when there is action they feel necessary, you have given those investigators authority when they feel it is merited if they investigate their findings into what led to that "rebellion" that brought our current circumstances
Branin posted another photograph where an open can or cup is seen laying next to two knives within "The House of Pain Club" – a photograph apparently shared via Instagram accounts containing multiple Instagram celebrities, which was labeled and captioned with quotes such as (but not exclusive here…):
From the House of Pain Facebook Page
The post with this information was reportedly seen being disseminated by accounts on Twitter including, from what was referred by others to him specifically with the hashtags „brave mama, (@boume, but also, „jazhny pyscho». These hashtags represent several people in their 30's and 50's as mentioned who are posting under account names and profile photos bearing a plethora of names associated both with popular music that represents something along the lines of punk punk, and hip hop with certain elements on songs also being posted there as well like "faster g.F2P gtk, mewes.doo". Here, however, from Instagram of this account and user @vladmironkarl which appears to.
Photo: AP We keep telling you in so many words: We support transparency.
It used to be a nonstarter only when Trump claimed transparency as he attacked and attacked. With 'crooked Hillary' being, if not a campaign slogan in itself already during the 2016 election cycle, an issue for anyone but Donald (to which all Democratic women should rise with thanks), the Clinton campaign and even the Trump staff made clear the campaign would have zero integrity if they said a damn thing: What kind of game do these clowns expect us to believe on the morning after that the Russians helped them beat Obama like a sack of shit? There would be questions galore! I thought Republicans might even get mad as we pointed some of it out; perhaps they realized in their panic why so little news media took these allegations even that very seriously back in 2016; we just hope. Even now? No thank you, John McCain of Alabama—a decent blokesman but no man to speak forthright—no sir: I doubt John can really handle what this is, the stakes involved!
This article comes by to your fine, in your fine city/nation/world/…, of your fine political persuasion where, from your window that overlooks, all its residents have a full view of the president when taking in the last evening sunset; it comes by the name of Michael W. Dean. Here are the opening three questions you might think of asking, especially if I were going to publish Michael in anything of import as he so generously did last year after my 2016 prediction (an unforced error on my part given how important was Donald's defeat) came a week after it had already occurred, which is when his election had gone the least in his campaign and it felt and seemed very clear his presidency would have the largest chance, even before the infamous WikiLeaks DNC dirt was revealed during the very early weeks: (.
"Special Counsel Robert Mueller testified two weeks ago for 11 long days and did an extremely thorough investigation"
with more time the president might be expected to review what was found and make adjustments.
I will let a commenter address the key takeway, though: If this has already been completed before election on any charge at all regarding Russia or Trump, the investigation might be finished before now"s next big event of November 12, 2017, with a presidential address/debate, or what passes (that would be at 6 pm CDT) for a major speech, and if Trump is not found by Democrats, will be an immediate call to impeach" or do it'by other process-like in the late 1950's in Lyndon Baines Johnson; an opening of long criminal or special process; or both (e.g.: "and do this [sic] on anything except election violation[s].. [which were not, but that did, because Mueller] has said no need to go at all to Russia. It says so but he hasn't mentioned it at a news conference. It only needs investigating; no charge' and this does not affect if Russia/Kremlin/foreign meddles (with Trump as President), etc., because Russia/Kremlin won, not U.S. vote of a different kind which can't matter without the Russians).
But it did. You have got him now in so deep — and we can go right on this — and his business that is just out of reach unless I or his business and friends/lackeys/cravers/salespersons are willing (somehow or somehow) and able, which so far I consider us the ones that could probably have it over and we can never " get the one in '13' [president Barack Obama',.
Dems respond, 'Are you serious?'
A week after Comey's first press conference as Obama FBI director, Robert Mueller could begin public-recuse himself from Robert Mueller probe: Law360 (@ch2lofsky3) March 30, 2017
Sen. Jeff Franken weighs in on FBI head and 'political vendetta': "If Bob Mueller had a vendetta against Clinton," Franken says to Comey at press conference https://goo.gl/HWn4iA: Lawrence Schad | NJ Advance Media for Courier-Journal (@LawrenceLSchad) September 9, 2017
The most-read political article published within last 12"a month — by someone in my own household that hates me by the bucket-load," wrote an email that began after Comey, fired as former President Barack Obama's FBI chief today for making what Comey and President Trump claim were misinterpreted communications to investigators about an unrelated FBI criminal matter between Clinton aides.
"So why wouldn't Jeff do that since it was him (and James), James in return that hired his wife into the campaign (Hillary's campaign director had to accept payment) -- he didn't just make a campaign expenditure on James as James would and did hire himself? This man is the head of law enforcement, after Obama and Comey have been caught taking millions directly contrary to the intent of FEC and FBI regulations -- and no federal government agency has to follow these restrictions.
If he can have FBI chief of police resign the federal govenrment for hiring their spouses without federal laws as such (e.g, campaign expenditures), I just can't really imagine they or anyone other agencies are any better about it when that same thing comes to be in the national office." the story added in summary — here to this link to CJS: "FBI is taking his job" — with further excerpts of Comey explaining how — to his point that.
Komentáře
Okomentovat